answer:Title: The Ethical Implications Surrounding the Employment of Mass Surveillance for Data Collection in Contemporary Society Introduction The advancement in information and communication technologies has accelerated the growth of mass surveillance in contemporary society (Lyon, 2003). Governments and private organizations justify the collection and monitoring of vast amounts of data by pointing to its necessity for national security, crime prevention, and resource allocation (Fuchs et al., 2011). However, ethical concerns about privacy invasion, misuse of data, and impact on civil liberties have led to significant debates among scholars, policymakers, and citizens alike (Dandeker, 2006). This essay will explore the ethical implications of mass surveillance, covering the historical development, potential benefits, impact on privacy and civil liberties, and the role of legislation and regulation in contemporary society. Historical Development of Mass Surveillance Surveillance practices have been consistently present throughout human history. However, the digital age has revolutionized the scale and nature of these practices (Andrejevic, 2007). The development of the internet, social media platforms, and sophisticated monitoring tools has equipped governments and industries to collect and analyze unprecedented quantities of data (Fuchs et al., 2011). Consequently, mass surveillance activities have significant implications on privacy, human rights, and the fundamental structure of contemporary society (Lyon, 2003). Benefits of Data Collection for National Security and Crime Prevention Mass surveillance has been hailed as a critical tool in combatting terrorism and preventing crime (Ball et al., 2015). Intelligence agencies and law enforcement institutions claim that by analyzing large data sets, they can identify suspects, track criminal activities, and prevent future attacks (The Royal United Services Institute, 2015). Additionally, mass surveillance can improve public sector decision-making, facilitating efficient allocation of resources and support in maintaining security (Kitchin, 2014). Moreover, private companies increasingly rely on data analytics to optimize operations and enhance customer services (Greenberg, 2017). Impact on Privacy and Civil Liberties Despite the potential benefits of mass surveillance, numerous ethical concerns arise. Invasion of privacy is a significant issue as the collection of personal information inherently poses risks to individuals' privacy rights (Solove, 2007). Furthermore, pervasive monitoring of individuals by intelligence agencies or corporations undermines autonomy, freedom of speech, and democratic values (Lyon, 2003). Stoddart (2012) highlights the risk of "chilling effects" where people self-censor or avoid particular activities due to surveillance-related fears, which further erode democratic processes. Another ethical concern is the misuse of collected data. As control over large quantities of data inherently confers power, there is a risk that this power may be employed for purposes beyond the initial intent (Ball et al., 2015; Timan, 2019), including political manipulation, biased profiling, or discrimination against specific social groups (Andrew et al., 2018). The Role of Legislation and Regulation A primary challenge in addressing the ethical implications of mass surveillance is balancing legitimate security objectives with the protection of individual privacy and civil liberties (Wright & Kreissl, 2014). Consequently, policymakers and researchers advocate the establishment of transparent, accountable, and comprehensive regulatory frameworks to govern mass surveillance activities (Tufekci, 2018; Gilliom & Monahan, 2013). Conclusion The ethical implications surrounding the employment of mass surveillance for data collection in contemporary society are complex and multifaceted. Although it offers potential benefits such as national security and crime prevention, the risks to individual privacy and civil liberties must be addressed. A rigorous approach to legislation and regulation that ensures transparency, accountability, and upholds privacy and civil liberties is necessary to navigate these ethical challenges in contemporary society. References Andrejevic, M. (2007) 'Surveillance in the Digital Enclosure', The Communication Review, 10(4), pp. 295-317. Andrew, T., Michael, J., and Olivier, S. (2018) 'Governments and Data: The Risks of Surveillance and The Need for Trust', Global Policy, 9(2), pp. 30-38. Ball, K., Haggerty, K.D., and Lyon, D. (eds.) (2015) Routledge Handbook of Surveillance Studies, Routledge. Dandeker, C. (2006) Surveillance, Power, and Modernity: Bureaucracy and Discipline from 1700 to the Present Day, Polity Press. Fuchs, C., Boersma, K., Albrechtslund, A. and Sandoval, M. (eds.) (2011) Internet and Surveillance: The Challenges of Web 2.0 and Social Media, Routledge. Greenberg, A. (2017) 'Data-driven Policing: New Tools for Old Problems or Fundamental Change?', Socio-Economic Review, 15(2), pp. 341-362. Kitchin, R. (2014) The Data Revolution: Big Data, Open Data, Data Infrastructures and Their Consequences, Sage. Lyon, D. (2003) Surveillance as Social Sorting: Privacy, Risk, and Digital Discrimination, Routledge. Solove, D.J. (2007) 'The Future of Reputation: Gossip, Rumor, and Privacy on the Internet', Yale University Press. Stoddart, E. (2012) 'The Double-edged Sword of the Digital Age: Big Data and the Rise of Dataveillance, In: C. Slane (Ed.) Big Data: Opportunities & Challenges (pp. 45-68). Oxford Internet Institute. The Royal United Services Institute (2015) A Democratic License to Operate: Report of The Surveillance Citizens' Jury, RUSI Occasional Papers. Timan, T. (2019) Surveillance, Privacy, and Public Spaces: Beyond the Panopticon, Routledge. Tufekci, Z. (2018) Twitter and Tear Gas: The Power and Fragility of Networked Protest, Yale University Press. Wright, D., and Kreissl, R. (eds.) (2014) Surveillance in Europe, Routledge.

answer:The pronoun "we" is used to refer to a group of two or more people, including the speaker and at least one other person. It implies a sense of collective identity, shared activity, or joint purpose. The use of "we" can be used to show inclusion, belonging, or working together with others.

answer:Sorry, as an AI language model, I am not sure what you meant by "с" without any context. Can you please provide me with more information or a complete sentence so that I can assist you better?

answer:URL "Installation Source" для установки CentOS-7-x86_64-NetInstall-2009 выглядит следующим образом: http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/os/x86_64/. Вы можете использовать этот URL или выбрать ближайшее зеркало отсюда: http://mirrorlist.centos.org/?release=7&arch=x86_64&repo=os.